Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assertion failed in EmitLV() #1545

Closed
asl opened this issue Feb 5, 2007 · 2 comments
Closed

Assertion failed in EmitLV() #1545

asl opened this issue Feb 5, 2007 · 2 comments
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla llvm-tools All llvm tools that do not have corresponding tag

Comments

@asl
Copy link
Collaborator

asl commented Feb 5, 2007

Bugzilla Link 1173
Resolution FIXED
Resolved on Feb 22, 2010 12:46
Version trunk
OS Linux
Blocks #1538
Attachments First failed .c, Another testcase, Patch for first testcase

Extended Description

I think attached two sources are triggering the same bug:

20050516-1.c:12: internal compiler error: in EmitLV, at llvm-convert.cpp:5037 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions.
@lattner
Copy link
Collaborator

lattner commented Feb 5, 2007

Anton fixed this, patch here:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20070129/043904.html

Testcase here: test/CFrontend/2007-02-04-AddrLValue.c

-Chris

@asl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

asl commented Nov 26, 2021

mentioned in issue llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive#1176

@llvmbot llvmbot transferred this issue from llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive Dec 3, 2021
jeanPerier pushed a commit to jeanPerier/llvm-project that referenced this issue Apr 1, 2022
There is no need to lower the implicit lower bounds for assumed-shape
array in lowerExplicitLowerBounds. Remove the unused code.
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla llvm-tools All llvm tools that do not have corresponding tag
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants