Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename PackedType as VectorType #1567

Closed
llvmbot opened this issue Feb 10, 2007 · 4 comments
Closed

Rename PackedType as VectorType #1567

llvmbot opened this issue Feb 10, 2007 · 4 comments
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla code-cleanup llvm:core

Comments

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Feb 10, 2007

Bugzilla Link 1195
Resolution FIXED
Resolved on Feb 22, 2010 12:56
Version trunk
OS All
Reporter LLVM Bugzilla Contributor
CC @lattner

Extended Description

Vector is more technically accurate for the purposes of this type. Its also less
confusing with PackedStructType.

Code, comments, doc must all be udpated.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

llvmbot commented Feb 14, 2007

Mine.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

llvmbot commented Feb 15, 2007

llvm-gcc patch for PackedType -> VectorType
This patch changes the use of PackedType to VectorType in llvm-gcc.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

llvmbot commented Feb 15, 2007

@lattner
Copy link
Collaborator

lattner commented Feb 15, 2007

Applying the llvm-gcc patch.

@llvmbot llvmbot transferred this issue from llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive Dec 3, 2021
kitano-metro pushed a commit to RIKEN-RCCS/llvm-project that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2023
refs llvm#1567 llvm#1578 レジスタ割り付けバグ修正

See merge request a64fx-swpl/llvm-project!51
troelsbjerre pushed a commit to troelsbjerre/llvm-project that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2024
…ributions

Cherry pick masterful contributions
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla code-cleanup llvm:core
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants