We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vector is more technically accurate for the purposes of this type. Its also less confusing with PackedStructType.
Code, comments, doc must all be udpated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Mine.
Sorry, something went wrong.
llvm-gcc patch for PackedType -> VectorType This patch changes the use of PackedType to VectorType in llvm-gcc.
This conversion is now done, with this patch: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20070212/044525.html through this patch: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20070212/044547.html
Reid.
Applying the llvm-gcc patch.
Merge branch 'feature/1571' into 'swpl-1'
f6f7bf5
refs llvm#1567 llvm#1578 レジスタ割り付けバグ修正 See merge request a64fx-swpl/llvm-project!51
Merge pull request llvm#1567 from fredriss/cherry-pick-masterful-cont…
edb0acd
…ributions Cherry pick masterful contributions
No branches or pull requests
Extended Description
Vector is more technically accurate for the purposes of this type. Its also less
confusing with PackedStructType.
Code, comments, doc must all be udpated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: