Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[dragonegg] non-local gotos not supported #1763

Closed
lattner opened this issue May 5, 2007 · 3 comments
Closed

[dragonegg] non-local gotos not supported #1763

lattner opened this issue May 5, 2007 · 3 comments
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla enhancement Improving things as opposed to bug fixing, e.g. new or missing feature obsolete Issues with old (unsupported) versions of LLVM wontfix Issue is real, but we can't or won't fix it. Not invalid

Comments

@lattner
Copy link
Collaborator

lattner commented May 5, 2007

Bugzilla Link 1391
Version trunk
OS All

Extended Description

This is needed for full nested function support. Here is a testcase:

main()
{
label l;

void*x()
{
goto l;
}

x();
abort();
return;
l:
exit(0);
}
@lattner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lattner commented Dec 2, 2010

Noone cares, and clang won't support nested functions.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Dec 2, 2010

Moving to dragonegg.

@llvmbot llvmbot transferred this issue from llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive Dec 3, 2021
@asl asl added obsolete Issues with old (unsupported) versions of LLVM wontfix Issue is real, but we can't or won't fix it. Not invalid labels Dec 14, 2021
@asl
Copy link
Collaborator

asl commented Dec 14, 2021

Dragonegg is obsolete

@asl asl closed this as completed Dec 14, 2021
@Endilll Endilll added enhancement Improving things as opposed to bug fixing, e.g. new or missing feature and removed missing-feature labels Aug 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla enhancement Improving things as opposed to bug fixing, e.g. new or missing feature obsolete Issues with old (unsupported) versions of LLVM wontfix Issue is real, but we can't or won't fix it. Not invalid
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@asl @Endilll @lattner @llvmbot