Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

EQUIVALENCE not supported in llvm-gfortran #2343

Closed
asl opened this issue Feb 1, 2008 · 4 comments
Closed

EQUIVALENCE not supported in llvm-gfortran #2343

asl opened this issue Feb 1, 2008 · 4 comments
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla compile-fail Use [accepts-invalid] and [rejects-valid] instead enhancement Improving things as opposed to bug fixing, e.g. new or missing feature llvm-tools All llvm tools that do not have corresponding tag

Comments

@asl
Copy link
Collaborator

asl commented Feb 1, 2008

Bugzilla Link 1971
Resolution FIXED
Resolved on Apr 09, 2008 04:41
Version trunk
OS Linux
Attachments Testcase

Extended Description

Current gimple=>LLVM IR lowering does not support handling of fortran EQUIVALENCE blocks. This looks like the last 'lack of feature' bug know so far.

Testcase from polyhedron attached.
@asl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

asl commented Feb 2, 2008

I've checked all FORTRAN benchmarks from SPEC 2006, It looks like that only three of them fail to compile and both due to this problem. These are 416.gamess, 434.zeusmp and 481.wrf. Will check CFP2000 later.

@asl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

asl commented Feb 2, 2008

From CFP2000 only 187.facerec ICEs due to this problem. Other stuff builds fine

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Apr 9, 2008

Fixed with a suboptimal hack here:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080407/060859.html

@naromero77
Copy link

mentioned in issue llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive#46334

@llvmbot llvmbot transferred this issue from llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive Dec 3, 2021
@Endilll Endilll added enhancement Improving things as opposed to bug fixing, e.g. new or missing feature and removed missing-feature labels Aug 15, 2023
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bugzilla Issues migrated from bugzilla compile-fail Use [accepts-invalid] and [rejects-valid] instead enhancement Improving things as opposed to bug fixing, e.g. new or missing feature llvm-tools All llvm tools that do not have corresponding tag
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@asl @naromero77 @Endilll @llvmbot