New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[P1102R2] acceptance of invalid lambda syntax in C++23 #49080

Closed

llvmbot opened this issue Mar 27, 2021 · 6 comments

Labels

Collaborator

llvmbot commented Mar 27, 2021


Bugzilla Link	49736
Resolution	FIXED
Resolved on	Mar 31, 2021 03:21
Version	trunk
OS	All
Reporter	LLVM Bugzilla Contributor
CC	@mkurdej,@zygoloid

Extended Description

https://godbolt.org/z/oz3x6eeYK

auto l = [] noexcept requires true {};

Although I am not particularly sure, this kind of grammar should be considered wrong?

Collaborator Author

llvmbot commented Mar 27, 2021

You can see more details in https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66833334/the-validity-of-lambda-expression-with-omitted-parameter-list-in-c23

Member

mkurdej commented Mar 29, 2021

Patch in review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99489.
Thanks for reporting. I'm the one to blame :).

Collaborator Author

llvmbot commented Mar 29, 2021

Just want to make c++ better, thank you for your hard work and contribution.

Member

mkurdej commented Mar 30, 2021

Fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rGa99b8ae3909106d831d880c1647dabe92f470290.

Member

mkurdej commented Mar 31, 2021

Changed component to C++2b.

Member

mkurdej commented Nov 27, 2021

mentioned in issue llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive#49754

llvmbot transferred this issue from llvm/llvm-bugzilla-archive

This issue was closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment