You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So in the assembler %0 would act like a name for the purpose
of assembling, but internally no name would be assigned to the
value (so the value might be written out to assembler later as
%1 or some other number).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree. I think what we basically want is for the "%4 = " to be optional, but for the assembler to verify that it matches up with the numbering the instruction would otherwise get. This is primarily to make dumps more readable, not to make writing .ll files easier.
Extended Description
The assembler is hard to read when values have no names. Here's what it
looks like currently:
How about changing it to this:
?
So in the assembler %0 would act like a name for the purpose
of assembling, but internally no name would be assigned to the
value (so the value might be written out to assembler later as
%1 or some other number).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: