LLVM Bugzilla is read-only and represents the historical archive of all LLVM issues filled before November 26, 2021. Use github to submit LLVM bugs

Bug 48920 - test\CodeGenCXX\debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp fails on 32-bit windows
Summary: test\CodeGenCXX\debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp fails on 32-bit win...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: clang
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -New Bugs (show other bugs)
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC Linux
: P enhancement
Assignee: Unassigned Clang Bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: release-12.0.0
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2021-01-28 05:29 PST by Hans Wennborg
Modified: 2021-01-29 22:22 PST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed By Commit(s): 0024efc69ea6cd0b630cd11cef5991b7edb73ffc 99f43f598907


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hans Wennborg 2021-01-28 05:29:32 PST
in a VS 2019 x86 Native Tools Command Prompt

with llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1 checked out

cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;openmp" ..\llvm
ninja check-clang


-- Testing: 27111 tests, 32 workers --
Testing:  0.. 10.
FAIL: Clang :: CodeGenCXX/debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp (4751 of 27111)
******************** TEST 'Clang :: CodeGenCXX/debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1';   c:\src\llvm.monorepo\build.openmp\bin\clang.exe -cc1 -internal-isystem c:\src\llvm.monorepo\build.openmp\lib\clang\12.0.0\include -nostdsysteminc c:\src\llvm.monorepo\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp -gcodeview -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -S    -emit-llvm -o - | c:\src\llvm.monorepo\build.openmp\bin\filecheck.exe c:\src\llvm.monorepo\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp
--
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stdout):
--
$ ":" "RUN: at line 1"
$ "c:\src\llvm.monorepo\build.openmp\bin\clang.exe" "-cc1" "-internal-isystem" "c:\src\llvm.monorepo\build.openmp\lib\clang\12.0.0\include" "-nostdsysteminc" "c:\src\llvm.monorepo\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp" "-gcodeview" "-debug-info-kind=line-tables-only" "-S" "-emit-llvm" "-o" "-"
$ "c:\src\llvm.monorepo\build.openmp\bin\filecheck.exe" "c:\src\llvm.monorepo\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp"
# command stderr:
c:\src\llvm.monorepo\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp:28:12: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
 // CHECK: ![[MTYPE]] = !DISubroutineType(types: !{{.*}})
           ^
<stdin>:60:123: note: scanning from here
!19 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "C", scope: !10, file: !9, line: 7, size: 8, flags: DIFlagFwdDecl)
                                                                                                                          ^
<stdin>:60:123: note: with "MTYPE" equal to "20"
!19 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "C", scope: !10, file: !9, line: 7, size: 8, flags: DIFlagFwdDecl)
                                                                                                                          ^
<stdin>:61:1: note: possible intended match here
!20 = !DISubroutineType(cc: DW_CC_BORLAND_thiscall, types: !21)
^

Input file: <stdin>
Check file: c:\src\llvm.monorepo\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp

-dump-input=help explains the following input dump.

Input was:
<<<<<<
            .
            .
            .
           55: !14 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "test", scope: !9, file: !9, line: 15, type: !11, scopeLine: 15, flags: DIFlagPrototyped, spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2)
           56: !15 = !DILocation(line: 21, column: 3, scope: !14)
           57: !16 = !DILocation(line: 29, column: 5, scope: !14)
           58: !17 = !DILocation(line: 30, column: 1, scope: !14)
           59: !18 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "m", scope: !19, file: !9, line: 8, type: !20, scopeLine: 8, flags: DIFlagPrototyped, spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !2)
           60: !19 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "C", scope: !10, file: !9, line: 7, size: 8, flags: DIFlagFwdDecl)
check:28'0                                                                                                                               X error: no match found
check:28'1                                                                                                                                 with "MTYPE" equal to "20"
           61: !20 = !DISubroutineType(cc: DW_CC_BORLAND_thiscall, types: !21)
check:28'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
check:28'2     ?                                                               possible intended match
           62: !21 = !{null, !22}
check:28'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           63: !22 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !19, size: 32, flags: DIFlagArtificial | DIFlagObjectPointer)
check:28'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           64: !23 = !DILocation(line: 8, column: 13, scope: !18)
check:28'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>

error: command failed with exit status: 1

--

********************
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
********************
Failed Tests (1):
  Clang :: CodeGenCXX/debug-info-gline-tables-only-codeview.cpp
Comment 1 Hans Wennborg 2021-01-28 05:33:56 PST
> <stdin>:61:1: note: possible intended match here
> !20 = !DISubroutineType(cc: DW_CC_BORLAND_thiscall, types: !21)

I suppose the problem is that the test wasn't expecting the calling convention there... I'll see if I can just fix that real quick.
Comment 2 Hans Wennborg 2021-01-28 05:45:23 PST
0024efc69ea6cd0b630cd11cef5991b7edb73ffc should to it.

Tom, can you please merge this to the release branch?
Comment 3 Hans Wennborg 2021-01-28 08:49:32 PST
> Tom, can you please merge this to the release branch?

Sorry, forgot to add the CC.

Also happy to merge myself of course if you approve.
Comment 4 Tom Stellard 2021-01-29 22:22:41 PST
Merged: 99f43f598907